|
The most detrimental phenomenon to productivity is unstable cutting. This
reduces the tool life and surface quality of the workpiece. Many theoretical investigations
are available in literature for prediction of stable and unstable cutting states in
orthogonal cutting. In most of the cases, the stability lobe diagram is generated from an
analytical linear model by varying one operating parameter at a time. However, cutting
processes possess highly nonlinear relationships among the input and output parameters.
In orthogonal turning, it is well known that the cutting forces depend on the
operating variables such as feed, depth of cut and speed. These variables are often used
to control the forces or machining stability by establishing appropriate
regression relations. Rao and Shin (1999) studied and found that tool geometry and flank
wear have great influence on cutting dynamics. Chiou and Liang (1998) studied the
chatter stability of a slender cutting tool and tool wear effect on cutting
dynamics. Chandiramani and Pothala (2006) presented dynamics of regenerative chatter
during turning operation after considering the variations in shear angle. Berados et al. (2006), Chen and Tsao (2006), and Martinez et al. (2008) have found that the compliance
of the work piece has a great influence on cutting dynamics. Azouzi and Guillot
(1997), and Risbood et al. (2003) have carried out an experimental investigation to
distinguish the stability states of cutting on the basis of output features, such as surface
roughness and vibrations in turning operation. Tangjitsitcharoen and Moriwaki (2007)
found that the type of chips plays an important role and it can be employed effectively
in addition to the cutting force data and stability states.
In practice, there are several other operating parameters like tool
overhanging length and type of material, which could also alter the critical operating
conditions in parallel. For example, variation of tool overhang length changes the stiffness of
the tool holder which, in turn, affects the tool life under unstable conditions.
Likewise, the effects of cutting fluids on the surface roughness and tool wear have been
predicted (Dhar and Kamruzzaman, 2006). Gaitonde et al. (2008) studied the overall influence of the amount of lubrication along with cutting speed and feed rates on the
surface roughness and specific cutting forces which directly effects the stability of the
process. Shetty et al. (2008) found that variables like steam pressure influence the
surface roughness of the workpiece. Based on this finding they developed a model of
cutting tool dynamics. |